[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 1681
Date: Thu Jul 22 06:11:28 BST 1999
Author: Freedom
Subject: Re: about the new enchant items (long rant)


You play on Zek to i see as to a last name yeah it is a real pun :)


----- Original Message -----
From: Garett <osmosis@...>
To: <eqenchanters@onelist.com>
Sent: Thursday, 22 July 1999 10:41:AM
Subject: Re: [eqenchanters] about the new enchant items (long rant)


> From: "Garett" <osmosis@...>
>
> Personally I'd love to be able to enchant items, but I also have to agree
> that since we've come this close to being balanced with the other classes
> (that arent fucked up), we might be asking for trouble. I thought of the
> problem of there being a sudden surge of magical weapons in norrath and
how
> that could completely flood a possible market quite quickly, but I suppose
> that could be solved by making enchant : item, ore, weapon very high level
> spells, and either a lore item/quest item or in a difficult place (or
> unobvious) place to get it. Then will it make us that much tougher? Well
> you can certainly imagine there will be a few more people interested in
> playing enchanters, and personally I think I see enough enchanters now
(I'd
> like to be the only one really). We'd be in very high demand, but we have
> gotten that from some other spells like clarity (IMHO our greatest asset
not
> unlike SoW). Yeas well you can see how scattered my thinking is today so
> I'm shuttin up. You can pick that apart.
>
> Cogg - Rallos Zek (20)
>
>
> btw, what do you think of the last name Zilla? I think its cheezy myself
> but many seem to like the idea... any suggestions?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Farr, Robert <robert.farr@...>
> To: <eqenchanters@onelist.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 1999 7:46 AM
> Subject: RE: [eqenchanters] about the new enchant items (long rant)
>
>
> > From: "Farr, Robert" <robert.farr@...>
> >
> > Giving us the ability to enchant items would not add anything to our
class
> > to unbalance it vs. other casting classes. It is just a continution of
our
> > current enchant metals line. It is what our class is about. There are
lots
> > of jewelcrafters out there that aren't enchanters, just as there will be
a
> > lot of people who aren't enchanters crafting magic weapons and armor if
we
> > get the ability to enchant ore in the future. This isn't an 'addition'
to
> > our class, this is finally delivering what was promised...
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: XIII [SMTP:dlepriol@...]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 1999 3:18 AM
> > > To: eqenchanters@onelist.com
> > > Subject: Re: [eqenchanters] about the new enchant items (long rant)
> > >
> > > From: XIII <dlepriol@...>
> > >
> > > Party pooper, party pooper. Ok you know the song, this time I fill the
> > > role
> > > :).
> > >
> > > May I point out that the message said that the code was going to be
> > > implemented, not that -we- enchanters are going to benefit from it.
> True,
> > > it was stated in the book we could do it, but at no time in B4 it was
in
> > > effect, and, according to EQE, we received other benefits to make up
for
> > > it.
> > >
> > > As I see it, such thing would overbalance us (enchanters) in regard
> > > of
> > > other pure spell user classes. So either the benefit will be too small
> to
> > > even consider it or too huge and Verant might take out something in
> return
> > > to balance our classe again. Don't tell me we're nerfed now. We were,
> > > true,
> > > but that was sometime ago and from my point of view we are rather
> balanced
> > > regarding other pure spell users. To sum up we have our "niche".
> > >
> > > So, the idea is: By talking here, and offering Verant options to
> > > consider
> > > we may have a say in the matter and make our class fuller in the
> way -we-
> > > see it. What I would like to see discussed here is : What can we give
up
> > > to
> > > have a 'proper' enchantment line of spells?. Or are we just to receive
> > > this
> > > new ability/spell/line of spells without giving up anything?.
> > >
> > > As stated above, I dont think we can't expect a 'useful' line of
> > > enchantment's spells unless we give up something in exchange. Thinking
> > > back
> > > of Beta, there was a line of spells we didn't have but nonetheless
still
> > > managed to survive and prosper : Pet line of spells. Plus they don't
fit
> > > enchanters very well . On the other hand, this line form the very core
> of
> > > most of our solo strategies so losing it wouldn't be a small thing.
> > >
> > > This is just an example, a topic's starter. Feel free to agree,
> > > disagree
> > > or tell me to shut up. Once again my aim to to talk things out here
> first
> > > and offer something (petition/ EQE/ you name it) constructive to
Verant
> > > before we see something not implemented or half implemented in place.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Ibnabeth / Karana
> > > still going up
> >
> > --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
> >
> > ONElist members are using Shared Files in great ways!
> > http://www.onelist.com
> > Are you? If not, see our homepage for details.
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
>
> Having difficulty getting "in synch" with list members?
> http://www.onelist.com
> Try ONElist's Shared Calendar to organize events, meetings and more!
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>