[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 1679
Date: Thu Jul 22 04:37:03 BST 1999
Author: refplace
Subject: Re: about the new enchant items (long rant)
>From: XIII <dlepriol@...>it.
>
>Party pooper, party pooper. Ok you know the song, this time I fill the role
>:).
>
> May I point out that the message said that the code was going to be
>implemented, not that -we- enchanters are going to benefit from it. True,
>it was stated in the book we could do it, but at no time in B4 it was in
>effect, and, according to EQE, we received other benefits to make up for
>I would be hapy to lose our pets.
> As I see it, such thing would overbalance us (enchanters) in regard of
>other pure spell user classes. So either the benefit will be too small to
>even consider it or too huge and Verant might take out something in return
>to balance our classe again. Don't tell me we're nerfed now. We were, true,
>but that was sometime ago and from my point of view we are rather balanced
>regarding other pure spell users. To sum up we have our "niche".
>
> So, the idea is: By talking here, and offering Verant options to consider
>we may have a say in the matter and make our class fuller in the way -we-
>see it. What I would like to see discussed here is : What can we give up to
>have a 'proper' enchantment line of spells?. Or are we just to receive this
>new ability/spell/line of spells without giving up anything?.
>
> As stated above, I dont think we can't expect a 'useful' line of
>enchantment's spells unless we give up something in exchange. Thinking back
>of Beta, there was a line of spells we didn't have but nonetheless still
>managed to survive and prosper : Pet line of spells. Plus they don't fit
>enchanters very well . On the other hand, this line form the very core of
>most of our solo strategies so losing it wouldn't be a small thing.
>
> This is just an example, a topic's starter. Feel free to agree, disagree
>or tell me to shut up. Once again my aim to to talk things out here first
>and offer something (petition/ EQE/ you name it) constructive to Verant
>before we see something not implemented or half implemented in place.
>
>Best,
>Ibnabeth / Karana
>still going up