Why are we even talking about temporary enchantments? Wouldn't you
prefer to create permanently enchanted objects? At leaset thew would
have market value. Selling a temporary enchantment is even worse than
selling summoned weapons.
--- refplace <
refplace@...> wrote:
> From: "refplace" <refplace@...>
>
>
>
> >From: XIII <dlepriol@...>
> >
> >Party pooper, party pooper. Ok you know the song,
> this time I fill the role
> >:).
> >
> > May I point out that the message said that the
> code was going to be
> >implemented, not that -we- enchanters are going to
> benefit from it. True,
> >it was stated in the book we could do it, but at no
> time in B4 it was in
> >effect, and, according to EQE, we received other
> benefits to make up for
> it.
> >
> > As I see it, such thing would overbalance us
> (enchanters) in regard of
> >other pure spell user classes. So either the
> benefit will be too small to
> >even consider it or too huge and Verant might take
> out something in return
> >to balance our classe again. Don't tell me we're
> nerfed now. We were, true,
> >but that was sometime ago and from my point of view
> we are rather balanced
> >regarding other pure spell users. To sum up we have
> our "niche".
> >
> > So, the idea is: By talking here, and offering
> Verant options to consider
> >we may have a say in the matter and make our class
> fuller in the way -we-
> >see it. What I would like to see discussed here is
> : What can we give up to
> >have a 'proper' enchantment line of spells?. Or are
> we just to receive this
> >new ability/spell/line of spells without giving up
> anything?.
> >
> > As stated above, I dont think we can't expect a
> 'useful' line of
> >enchantment's spells unless we give up something in
> exchange. Thinking back
> >of Beta, there was a line of spells we didn't have
> but nonetheless still
> >managed to survive and prosper : Pet line of
> spells. Plus they don't fit
> >enchanters very well . On the other hand, this line
> form the very core of
> >most of our solo strategies so losing it wouldn't
> be a small thing.
> >
> > This is just an example, a topic's starter. Feel
> free to agree, disagree
> >or tell me to shut up. Once again my aim to to talk
> things out here first
> >and offer something (petition/ EQE/ you name it)
> constructive to Verant
> >before we see something not implemented or half
> implemented in place.
> >
> >Best,
> >Ibnabeth / Karana
> >still going up
>
>
> I would be hapy to lose our pets.
> I went up to 9th level before seriously using a pet.
> Give us spells so we are wanted in a group even at
> low levels so that we can
> always find a group and I'll happily give up my pet
> for good. Even take
> charm if ya like.
> However Enchantments I see as a form of trade skill
> and people will want you
> to create tehm for them at little or no cost but
> tehn when it comes to
> partying ask waht you can do in a fight.
> That are give you a pity spot in the party to keep
> those temp enchantments
> coming. I dont see Enchantments having such a huge
> effect on our class no
> matter what form they take.
> Stonedreamer
>
>
>
> --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor
> ----------------------------
>
> Congratulations to RON MARTINO
> This week's FRIENDS & FAMILY WINNER!
> To join ONElist's Friends & Family program, go to
> http://www.onelist.com
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>