Yup, your right, I did it the same way. I figure that fate is prolly the
best way.
lets say you work and work to get alteration past 50 first, but you end up
using a different one more often.....then that was a waste of alteration.
the way we did it, I think is better, this way, the one you DO use the most
will get past 50 first, and that is the one you are meant to specialize in.
like stated earlier in someone else's e-mail.
each play plays an enchanter different. not all of us use alteration over
the others the most.
I should check to see which I am using the most.
perhaps seeing which you use most and then concentrating to get that one
past 50 is a better idea then listening to everyone else and how they play
theirs.
Aeramus Brainblaster
(bristlebain)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Farr, Robert [mailto:Robert.Farr@...]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 3:45 PM
> To: 'eqenchanters@onelist.com'
> Subject: RE: [eqenchanters] Specialization
>
>
> From: "Farr, Robert" <Robert.Farr@...>
>
> What we are all referring to is the fact that only one of the
> specializations can go past 50. As an enchanter, you'd hate for your
> specialization:Divination to be the one to hit 51 first.
>
> It sounds like you have done it the same way I did. I just put a point in
> and kept playing, letting fate decide which it would be.
>
> Qinie Isil'Goren
> 27 Enchanter
> Mith Marr
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Danny Devorkin [SMTP:devo@...]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 3:47 PM
> > To: eqenchanters@onelist.com
> > Subject: Re: [eqenchanters] Specialization
> >
> > From: "Danny Devorkin" <devo@...>
> >
> > you guys are confusing me hehe.
> > i am level 32 now, when i could specialize, i put one point into
> > each...alteration, conjeration, etc....
> > my skill in each one has been going up, what do you guys mean by
> > specializing in just one?
> > i am doing all of them....why should i choose one, and stick to only
> > casting
> > from that circle of magic?
> > in my opinion, put one point in each, then forget about it, let the
> > computer
> > take care of it as you cast spells. i know mine is doing great!
> >
> > Aeramus (Bristlebane)
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Tekdruid [mailto:Tekdruid@...]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 3:25 PM
> > > To: 'eqenchanters@onelist.com'
> > > Subject: RE: [eqenchanters] Specialization
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Tekdruid <Tekdruid@...>
> > >
> > > Good Point. What you choose for specialization is dependant on your
> > play
> > > style. It is RECOMMENDED that enchanters specialize in alteration, but
> > if
> > > you
> > > think another would be more useful, then specialize in that. A
> > > specialize:Conjuration would be useful as well for an enchanter who is
> > > strict
> > > crowd control and doesn't buff/debuff as much. Specialize:Alteration
is
> > > simply
> > > recommended mostly because most of the enchanters spells ARE
Alteration.
> > >
> > > Tinik
> > > 19 Gnomish Enchanter
> > > Veeshan
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, December 15, 1999 2:22 PM, Farr, Robert
> > > [SMTP:Robert.Farr@...] wrote:
> > > > From: "Farr, Robert" <Robert.Farr@...>
> > > >
> > > > The way I did it was to let the cards fall where they may. In other
> > words,
> > > I
> > > > trained a point in each and played the way I normally play. If my
> > > > specialization:Evocation had made it first, then obviously it was
the
> > one
> > > > that was used most often, and should be the one that got the
benefits
> > of
> > > > specialization. As luck would have it, my playstyle emphasized
> > Alteration,
> > > > so that's what my specialty is in. That actually surprised me, given
> > the
> > > > fact that the Mesmerize line of spells is Conjuration, and I use
those
> > > very
> > > > heavily. Anyway, I guess what I'm trying to say is that specializing
> > in
> > > > Alteration might be a good idea for Enchanters, but it may not be
for
> > ALL
> > > > Enchanters.
> > > >
> > > > My 2cp...
> > > >
> > > > Qinie Isil'Goren
> > > > 27 Enchanter
> > > > Mith Marr
> > > >
> > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >