What we are all referring to is the fact that only one of the
specializations can go past 50. As an enchanter, you'd hate for your
specialization:Divination to be the one to hit 51 first.
It sounds like you have done it the same way I did. I just put a point in
and kept playing, letting fate decide which it would be.
Qinie Isil'Goren
27 Enchanter
Mith Marr
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Danny Devorkin [SMTP:devo@...]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 3:47 PM
> To: eqenchanters@onelist.com
> Subject: Re: [eqenchanters] Specialization
>
> From: "Danny Devorkin" <devo@...>
>
> you guys are confusing me hehe.
> i am level 32 now, when i could specialize, i put one point into
> each...alteration, conjeration, etc....
> my skill in each one has been going up, what do you guys mean by
> specializing in just one?
> i am doing all of them....why should i choose one, and stick to only
> casting
> from that circle of magic?
> in my opinion, put one point in each, then forget about it, let the
> computer
> take care of it as you cast spells. i know mine is doing great!
>
> Aeramus (Bristlebane)
>
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tekdruid [mailto:Tekdruid@...]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 3:25 PM
> > To: 'eqenchanters@onelist.com'
> > Subject: RE: [eqenchanters] Specialization
> >
> >
> > From: Tekdruid <Tekdruid@...>
> >
> > Good Point. What you choose for specialization is dependant on your
> play
> > style. It is RECOMMENDED that enchanters specialize in alteration, but
> if
> > you
> > think another would be more useful, then specialize in that. A
> > specialize:Conjuration would be useful as well for an enchanter who is
> > strict
> > crowd control and doesn't buff/debuff as much. Specialize:Alteration is
> > simply
> > recommended mostly because most of the enchanters spells ARE Alteration.
> >
> > Tinik
> > 19 Gnomish Enchanter
> > Veeshan
> >
> > On Wednesday, December 15, 1999 2:22 PM, Farr, Robert
> > [SMTP:Robert.Farr@...] wrote:
> > > From: "Farr, Robert" <Robert.Farr@...>
> > >
> > > The way I did it was to let the cards fall where they may. In other
> words,
> > I
> > > trained a point in each and played the way I normally play. If my
> > > specialization:Evocation had made it first, then obviously it was the
> one
> > > that was used most often, and should be the one that got the benefits
> of
> > > specialization. As luck would have it, my playstyle emphasized
> Alteration,
> > > so that's what my specialty is in. That actually surprised me, given
> the
> > > fact that the Mesmerize line of spells is Conjuration, and I use those
> > very
> > > heavily. Anyway, I guess what I'm trying to say is that specializing
> in
> > > Alteration might be a good idea for Enchanters, but it may not be for
> ALL
> > > Enchanters.
> > >
> > > My 2cp...
> > >
> > > Qinie Isil'Goren
> > > 27 Enchanter
> > > Mith Marr
> > >
> >
> > >
>
>