> C: If you ment to mean that we should have more mana
> than Druids, I don't
> see why. Try playing one. Once you get past the
> 20s your pretty much a
> mana only person. Sure you can take a few extra
> hits (like 2 or 3) and
> maybe you can do a bit more damage in melee but its
> not that much. Not to
> bash on Druids as I said earlier I like that class
> but when stuff his
> hitting for 50 to 70 damage with multiple attacks
> Druid's don't last too long.

Just a note: A good friend with whom I work plays a druid. At level 31,
he's still meleeing/nuking blues and blacks to death. For a yellow,
he'll usually kite it through one DoT, and then nuke/melee it. For reds
up to the Resist cap, he just kites them.

True, he's nowhere near as good a tank as, say, an equivelant level
ranger. But that's still a lot less fragile than my lvl 20 wizard (who
started out 9 levels ahead...sigh) has ever seen.

(Note on my note: no opinion here, just a clarification)

>
> Lomack, Knight Defender of the BCK
> Master of Recruiting
> www.bck.org
> "The Crimson Knights"
> Fennin Ro
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com