[<a href='2111.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='2109.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='2111.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='2070.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 2110 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Mon May 31 17:33:05 BST 1999 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Dan Alexander <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: suggestions to Verant <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-11584014">At 04:33 PM 05/28/1999 EDT, you wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;From: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:mprez20@...">mprez20@...</a><br/>
&gt;I for one belive in the power of the wizard and I do know that brad and <br/>
&gt;verant have absolutely no intent of changing them.  I quote &quot;Wizards are by <br/>
&gt;far the most balanced casting class and to change anything to them now would <br/>
&gt;destroy 1 years worth of game balancing&quot;.  <br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;Adaar<br/>
&gt;Eruidte Wizard Welcoming all comments =)<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>But they&#39;ve changed the other classes already - doesn&#39;t that invalidate the<br/>
&quot;balancing&quot; already?  Or are they trying to say that Wizards are the<br/>
standard by which all other magic-using classes are judged?  That would be<br/>
a very cool distinction, but lower our chances of getting the Wizard class<br/>
changed to almost nil.<br/>
<br/>
-Pennaggolan, 3rd Circle Wizard of Felwithe</div>