[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 1321
Date: Fri May 14 10:23:34 BST 1999
Author: Fraser G Heath
Subject: Re: Ice Comet -Reply
>>> "Ken Morris" <kmorris2@...> 14/May/1999 10:17am >>>From: "Ken Morris" <kmorris2@...>
----- Original Message -----
From: Simon Hinshelwood <iktome@...>
To: <eq_wizards@onelist.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 1999 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: [eq_wizards] Ice Comet
> From: Simon Hinshelwood <iktome@...>
>
> Well said Jay. Parties cant be bothered with wizards, they cant buff, cant
heal
> and cant really help parties that much..."we were supposed to be heavy
> artillery" but that just is not correct. I think a wizard would be most
parties
> last choice if they could choose from all the classes.
>
> Its very easy to demonstrate the wizard immbalance; get into an arena with
a
> dual wield barbarian warrior of the same level and see how you do!
> Hmm doesn't sound too promising eh?
>
> I have always played a wizard character class in AD&D and UO but I regret
> playing one in EQ. I think EQ were nervous about the power wizards in UO
and
> didn't want to unbalance the game. I think they swung the pendalum too far
the
> other way. Root 'n' Shoot, if that fails death, thats about it.
>
> Hopefully e-mails will pour in and tell me how wrong I am. Great, show me
its
> not the case so I feel I have a character with a future!
>
> Simon
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ONElist: bringing the world together.
> http://www.onelist.com
> Join a new list today!
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got an opinion?
http://www.onelist.com
Make it count! Sign up for the ONElist Weekly Survey now.