[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 673
Date: Wed Jun 2 22:57:00 BST 1999
Author: Mark Muller
Subject: Re: Curious on 8 memorized spells for lev 16 through 23 rd level play ers ?


ah, but it would make us much more powerful, the 8 spells at a time is a
balancing effect, not a lack of proper interface. I like to think that the
strategy involved in memorizing spells is what sets us appart from the big
dumb warriors :) I'm not saying I wouldn't like to be able to mem *all* my
spells, or even 8 more, just that I think it would seriously give casters an
advantage, and reduce the need for tanks etc, especially for necros, who
already have the skeleton porta-tank.



> From: "Tony B" <tonyb72@...>
>
> i would really just like to be able to have spells ready in case of
> emergencies, without hurting my ordinary ability to dish out damage. for
> example, i almost always have ward undead, even if there are only a few
> undead around. resting after a battle and getting attack by a zombie is
no
> fun, even though they are rather weak opponents. even a high level,
> ordinary skeleton can do some damage if you dont have a pet and/or ward.
> just for comparison, i got trained by 3 skels, without a pet, and i was
able
> to kill them all. by the time i finished i was severly low on hp, and
just
> about out of mana (enough for gather shadows). if i wouldnt have had
ward,
> i would have been dark elf pot pie.
> i also like to keep either gather shadows or gate on hand, but it would be
> nice to have access to both. also, i almost always use dark pact, and the
> extra mana has saved my buns many a time. it would just be nice to have
the
> ability to use a good portion of the spells i have, instead of needing to
> choose a small handful. im sure any spellcaster can agree with that, but
> since we are already limited in our ability to take damage, i think the
> versatility would help, even if it doesnt really make us all that much
more
> powerful.
>