[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 298
Date: Mon May 10 04:19:33 BST 1999
Author: James Lecouffe
Subject: Re: Fw: [EQMagicians] Just a thought..
>From: "Shadow Panther" <shdwpanther@...>takes
>
>
> What reasons have they given for this, not giving us numerical values
>for our mana ?
>
> Maybe it's just the mood I'm in, but do they strike you as pricks?
>I mean, honestly.. they give us, in the spell's info, how much mana it
>to cast it, but they're out-right refusing to give us numbers showing howgive
>much mana we have? They're just being pricks about it, or at least, that's
>how it seems to me. What basis would they have for not?
>
> Not to mention all of the other limitations, and the "you're in our
>world now" that I thought was just a cool slogan, but now seems to be more
>of another way to say, "this is our world, we're in control, we think for
>you, we decide how you play, where you go, what you see, and if you don't
>like it _leave_ because it's _MINE_" . That's B.S., we pay for this...
>
> I dunno, I think I'll keep EQ until another company comes out with a
>full 3D fantasy role-playing world. You know it'll happen, and maybe
>they'll have their stuff straight.
>
>~Mysk
>
>> While the idea is a good one, Verant is very very very skeptical of
>> putting in any numbers beyond what they have already given. If they were
>> willing to give us this type of spell, they should also be willing to
>> us a numerical value for our mana -- something they have repeatedlystated
>> that they will not do. Your best bet is to ask for a spell thatdetermines
>> their lvl/abilities in non-numerical ways, otherwise I'm afraid you'll betolerated
>> talking into a void.
>>
>> Valdus
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Always wanted to set up a book club, but can't find the time?
>http://www.onelist.com
>Create an online book club through ONElist.
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>This list is basically unmoderated. However abusive language will not be
>