Ok, the warrior will have more HP, and can take more hits going from
full to dead. But remember that most of your time spent grouping
involves a monster pull, barsh some heads, you go down 40% life, the
cleric heals you up, you go pull again. The monk will lose roughly
the same amount of HP, (thus greater %HP), regen hp just as fast, and
be pulling again just as fast. In times when the warriors full hp
are needed for him to live, the monk can FD and live, and in
good steady groups, the greater warrior hp don't matter that much.

FD pulling is slow, and its much more efficient to just bring them
all and mez or just blast through the pack. FD pulling is still very
good, but it is not the best way to gain xp fast, my opinion.

>
> From: "Beandogy dog" <beandogydog@...>
>
> I am thinking of starting a monk or warrior. The main deciding factors for
> me are how much hp each have and how many hits they can take. Can monks
> take more hits than warriors if they use mend and have high agility? Which
> can dish out more damage up until level 30 or so? Thanx for any answers in
> advance. i am kind of leaning towards warrior though since all the bad
> stuff i heard about FD now.
>
> >