[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 824
Date: Fri Oct 8 17:29:39 BST 1999
Author: Jeffrey Sue
Subject: Re: Re: Lots o Wizard groups
>At 08:19 AM 10/8/99 -0700, you wrote:Well i actually run a bard as my primary char, and while most of this is
>>From: "Tim Perkins" <tperkins@...>
>>
>>Ever wonder why parties always want a monk to pull? Because the Monk IS the
>>best puler in the game Bar none.
>
>
> Once again, I am going to have to disagree. The Monk is the 2nd
> best puller in the game. The best puller is one that no one has mentioned
> yet: The Bard. The reason the Bard is the best puller is because of
> Kelin`s Lugubrious Lament (Lull), Kelin`s Lucid Lullaby (AoE Lull), and
> Selo's Accelerando. Bards can use the spells to pull EXACTLY one Mob and
> then hightail it back to the group. If they do pull more they can use
> Kelin's Lullaby to keep them occupied or just haul ass to zone. All in
> all, if you have a Bard that knows what he is doing, they are the best pullers.
>
> However, that all said and done, most Bards are not as adept at
> pulling as Monks are. Monks start honing their pulling skills early on.
> Bards, for the most part, never really work on pulling. So, given the
> same skill level and knowledge, a Bard is a better class for pulling. I
> still like a Monk because of the damage they deal. Bard songs are
> invaluable at higher levels though. I would choose a Bard (that knows
> what they are doing) over a Shaman/Druid/Paladin/Ranger if possible.