[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 758
Date: Wed Oct 6 20:09:49 BST 1999
Author: Bennett, Brian
Subject: RE: [Digest Number 83]


Nah, I'd rather have a 20+ cleric than a 20+ bard. Just me though :)

I've seen characters as low as 17 in MM. Like I said, I'm 20 and some of
the stuff is finally /conning blue. Most of it is yellow/red. But as a big
group, moving slowly and staying off the tracks, we do ok :) We fight our
way up to the castle and then back again.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Gaines [mailto:dave@...]
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 3:10 PM
To: EQ-Monks@onelist.com
Subject: Re: [[EQ-Monks] Digest Number 83]


From: Dave Gaines <dave@...>

>
> 1 - Monk
> 2 - Monk / Ranger / Paladin
> 3 - Enchanter
> 4 - Druid / Shaman
> 5 - Cleric
> 6 - Wizard / Magician
>
Change 2 to Monk / Warrior. In a group as diversified

as this, the spells they have are almost useless, and a warrior
should be able to taunt the monsters better.

Add a bard, replaces 5. In a group of 5 or 6
a bard is a far better healer than a cleric, and if needed in
a pinch, the druid/shaman can do the quick healing.

What is the min level for a group in Mistmoore?