Well, all of you give very good points. However, they all contradict each
others'. Like LKW and Sereph, both are solid facts but they "kick" each
other. In the end, its each to his own. Why can't we just play a game for
fun sake? But of course, who doesn't want to get all the goodies and hit
Level 50 <smiles>

EG, Paldines was collecting dust because Gary found that Garren had better
strength to balance out his character in the long run.

Ok, I just answered my question. Now I know why I play only a Monk. Simple.
Kick and punch and trash the shit out of others. I heard Calofia <40 Monk>
was dishing out devastating damage. I wonder when its my turn....laterz.

----- Original Message -----
From: LKW <leekw13@...>
> There is no doubt a TSK can solo best in EQ. They have the harm spells
> which is as good as Paladin's healing ability (no saving throw or
failure),
> yet they have the ability of regenerating HP ability. I made a troll
> shaman in Innoruuk for testing, at lvl 1 my first victim is a monster
which
> is yellow to me. And within the first 10 min I play, I gain a lvl.
>
> Btw, all classes always complain that they are weaker than other classes,
> seem to be a norm, hehe. I even read from the net how a lvl 40+ warrior
> complained abt his char as compare to a shadowknight who is few lvl below
> him - coz in term of soloing, this warrior can't handle big monster like
> that shadowknight.
>
> EQSS also have an article abt soloing - and they rank troll anything as
the
> easiest soloing char, esp TSK, followed by wiz, shaman, dwarf cleric and
> monk. One thing abt monk, at lvl 35+ they will jump to 2nd in the list,
ie
> the next best soloing class after Troll something, due to the new kick ass
> skills they achieve at higher level.