[<a href='3179.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='3177.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='3179.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='3177.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 3178 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Tue Sep 25 12:27:13 BST 2001 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Andrew Lam <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [sg-everquest] Is this list still alive? <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-176755770">guess what? www.noows.com<br/>
<br/>
FoH hates DAoC heh :)<br/>
Their message board is a very interesting read of what Furor has to say<br/>
about DAoC.<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> ----- Original Message -----<br/>
From: &quot;K. W. Lee&quot; &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:kw.lee@...">kw.lee@...</a>&gt;<br/>
To: &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:sg-everquest@yahoogroups.com">sg-everquest@yahoogroups.com</a>&gt;<br/>
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 11:39 AM<br/>
Subject: RE: [sg-everquest] Is this list still alive?<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
&gt; Stale?  U mean gfx?  If gfx is all u care, shld go back for AO :P<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; Anyway dun wanan start another flamewar of DAOC vs EQ.   I just post and<br/>
&gt; ask if anyone intend to go for DAOC can visit our forum n mailing list :)<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; On 20 September, 2001 7:19 PM, Andrew Lam [SMTP:<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:draco@...">draco@...</a>]<br/>
&gt; wrote:<br/>
&gt; &gt; still playing EQ. DAoC looks stale compared to Shadows of Luclin. </span></blockquote></div>