Ack, just deleted mine last week! <grins> Was on Great Lakes...ouch...
Thinking of heading back as well. However I've lost touch of the game liaw.
Maybe UO2 will be better?
Regards.
----- Original Message -----
From: LKW <leekw13@...>
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Surprised to say I didnt miss EQ over the weekend when I didn't login ;)
> Instead I login UO to settle some housing issues. UO will be
implementing
> a major item patch tomorrow, and I spend my weekend preparing for it.
>
> After this item patch, a skill management patch will come shortly, which
> greatly enhance the role-playing element of UO. With this skill patch, I
> will do lots of macroing when I sleep at night, hehe, till I get all the
> chars I want.
>
> With all these new patches, UO is becoming a much better game. I must
> admit I'm kinda bored with camping, lvling, hack and slash in EQ....and I
> think there is a lack of motivation for me to login EQ, even when I have
> nothing to do at home (in the end spend time watching TV series, hehe).
>
> Just to inform all that I will not show my face in EQ often in the month
of
> Oct, mainly due to many things I need to settle with the new UO patches
> (plus some guild matters too). I hope EQ will still attract me after Oct,
> or else I may consider selling away my acct, hehe.
>
> Other than sorting my house items during the weekend, I didnt go for any
> hunting in UO. Meeting all my good old buddies already take up half of my
> UO login time (sparred with some of them and still kill them, hehe).
There
> is no arguement that UO has better role-playing element than EQ. With the
> coming patches which UO will be implement teaming, pvp etc policies like
> EQ, I think more ex-UO players will be draw back from EQ to UO (provided
> they still have an active acct like me, coz UO just conduct a char purge
> last Fri, to delete all chars under acct not active for 3 months).
>
> If you guys wanna play UO, I'm in the Baja shard ;)
>
> Ziltus Planeswalker (aka Dark Flame in UO Baja shard)
>
> p/s: This is not a quiting-EQ msg, dun get me wrong. Just need to take a
> break from the plain hack-&-slash 'routine' work, hehe. ;)