I enjoy my Ranger character.. I just get tired of people complaining about
what their class doesn't have. I only posted that to say hey don't single
out classes that have perceived problems compared to others.. Rangers to
Palaies in particular.
Hehe, I remember when wizards were complaining that Ice Comet is just not
powerful enough. They claimed that without a more powerful spell, how could
they really be the masters of DD. =)
And as for your fun comment.. "Getting to 50 without having fun is plain
stupid." Teamwork and using the class specific skills would add to the fun,
posting everything on the internet is what sucks.
PS..
Was anyone online during the DE war last night.. What did you think of it
all?
-----Original Message-----
From:
alexander.jones@...
[mailto:
alexander.jones@...]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 1999 10:29 AM
To:
EverQuest@onelist.com
Subject: RE: [EverQuest] RE: [Ever Quest] new armor...
From:
alexander.jones@...
Oh, come on, stop moaning.
* Its weird that Rangers are better than Paladins in combats dont you think?
* Bards get Track at lvl35.
* The quest for SSoM is very simple to complete for the Ranger.
I have some of Ranger friends and they are doing great. I also have some
Pally friends and they are also doing great. Why does everybody want to be
the mightiest person in Norrath? I certainly do not. And wow people are
posting spawns points on the Internet, thats just not good for the game.
Getting to 50 without having fun is plain stupid.
ENJOY THE RIDE.
/Ranina the dunken Bard.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Whitmore, Lance [SMTP:lwhitmore@...]
> Sent: den 1 november 1999 15:40
> To: 'EverQuest@onelist.com'
> Subject: [EverQuest] RE: [Ever Quest] new armor...
>
> My question is... When have the Rangers truly ever been upgrade?
>
> 1. Given "Dances with Fire Flies spell" - wow that's a winner
> 2. Given Critical Hits with bows - that's a no brainer - even
> though warriors cover all weapons
> 3. Given Slightly Higher Caps on certain combat skills - making them
> at least similar, but lower, to the other combat classes
> 4. Given +4 SV against fire and cold - does this really matter,
> seriously =)
>
> That's it..
>
> Sure I have track, but so do druids and bards. Problem is, when all
> the quests and locations for MOBs are published on the internet, who needs
> that skill anymore. I remember Brad saying that he wanted to make Rangers
> the masters of duel wield... well how bout increasing our percentages for
> it.
>
> Oh well... =) Lance
>
>
> After the recent upgrade to the Ranger, Paladins were certain that
> they were
> next for enhancement. We waited patiently for the patch that was
> supposed to
> be our salvation. Instead, what we received was armor quests that
> were 10
> times the length and 5 times more costly than any of the quest of
> any other
> class. And for all of that the armor stinks. Class specific plate
> armor for
> the Paladin has less AC than that of the chain worn by the ranger.
> Paladins
> are the "Holy Knight" counterpart to the ranger. Yet, with the last
> 3
> patches, the Ranger has been augmented so that he has more AC even
> though he
> can wear no platemail. He also has higher skill caps, does nearly
> twice the
> damage in battle, has spell equivalents to most of the Paladins
> spells yet
> not confined to undead. Ensnare is far more effective that root.
> Several
> other spells and buffs of the druid class aren't nerfed , level
> wise, as with
> the paladin. The ranger can track. Whereas the paladin can point
> himself in
> the direction of the nearest undead, unless of course if there is a
> pet in
> the area. Now to the arguements.
>
>
>
Visit the EverQuest homepage at
http://www.everquest.com