[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 4596
Date: Thu Apr 24 18:11:12 BST 2003
Author: James
Subject: RE: [EverQuest] Re: SK or Pali


What did all that mean. Can u tell me what this bs ment

"LAINE. Mikael (Nol)" <laine@...> wrote:
Kinda sux to ask high-end stuff here? =P rofl, one of the replys had a
decent advice and the rest was exactly what you said you didn't want.

Another thing, dps means shit to a tank, a tank is about building aggro and
beeing the main focus of your mobs.

Pally is useless as a MT, SK is way better but why not a warrior if you're
looking for a MT? However, like the previous mail said, ogre SK would
probably be your best choice.

-----Original Message-----
From: Xariak [mailto:xquocdbz@...]
Sent: den 21 april 2003 23:58
To: EverQuest@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [EverQuest] Re: SK or Pali


yeah hands down SKs are better dps than pallys id never say different



Visit the EverQuest homepage at http://www.everquest.com


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Visit the EverQuest homepage at http://www.everquest.com


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.