[<a href='2742.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='2740.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='2743.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='2736.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 2741 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Sat Apr 20 04:04:42 BST 2002 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Su <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [EverQuest] Geforce 4 MX vs Geforce 4 Ti <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-83282846"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt;Also, the 4 MX doesnt support DirectX 8.1. I agree, after all is said and<br/>
 </span></blockquote>done I was getting great &gt;frame rates off of the 4 MX with full clip plane<br/>
and 4x AA. I personally got the 4 Ti for 299.00 &gt;and I am hopeful this video<br/>
card will last me at least three years. My last card was a Geforce 2 &gt;MX<br/>
with only 32MB of ram so I was really in need of an upgrade.<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;<br/>
 </span></blockquote>I&#39;ve got an 2MX with 64mb. I run it with full clip plane. its working fine<br/>
for me. Better than the graphics cards I had before. Can&#39;t really say much<br/>
about my Voodoo3 since it was a defective card.<br/>
The waterfall in GD sounds really cool with my Acoustic Edge 5.1. I bought<br/>
it as soon as they had beta drivers for XP. It rocks.<br/>
luv,<br/>
-Su</div>