[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 2732
Date: Fri Aug 30 10:57:34 BST 2030
Author: J. Smythe
Subject: Re: [EverQuest] Re: Geforce 4 MX vs Geforce 4 Ti


I bought a Geforce 4 Ti 4400 today, installed it, and it didnt work! I bought the Visiontek version, I think PNY makes one, I plan on getting that tomorrow.
----- Original Message -----
From: bigmaca3
To: EverQuest@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 4:18 PM
Subject: [EverQuest] Re: Geforce 4 MX vs Geforce 4 Ti

--- In EverQuest@y..., "J. Smythe" <lgumaer@h...> wrote:
> From tomshardware.com
>
>  This makes sense, since the GeForce4 MX is basically only a
GeForce2 chip with its simple T&L engine, a second RAMDAC for
DualDisplay functionality (nView), a watered-down version of
the 'LightSpeed Memory Architecture II' and an AccuView FSAA unit
added onto it. However, it does not have the DirectX 8 capable pixel
and vertex shaders of the GeForce4 Ti and the GeForce3 families.

I have a Geforce 2Ti and the change from my Geforce 256 was amazing. 
People are amazed that the clouds look like clouds now.  I plan on
getting the Geforce 4 as soon as the proce drops a bit more.

And I have no Direct X issues.



Visit the EverQuest homepage at http://www.everquest.com


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.