[<a href='2729.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='2727.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='2729.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='2722.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 2728 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Thu Apr 18 00:18:21 BST 2002 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> bigmaca3 <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Geforce 4 MX vs Geforce 4 Ti <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1245382659">--- In EverQuest@y..., &quot;J. Smythe&quot; &lt;lgumaer@h...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; From tomshardware.com<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt;  This makes sense, since the GeForce4 MX is basically only a <br/>
 </span></blockquote>GeForce2 chip with its simple T&L engine, a second RAMDAC for <br/>
DualDisplay functionality (nView), a watered-down version of <br/>
the &#39;LightSpeed Memory Architecture II&#39; and an AccuView FSAA unit <br/>
added onto it. However, it does not have the DirectX 8 capable pixel <br/>
and vertex shaders of the GeForce4 Ti and the GeForce3 families. <br/>
<br/>
I have a Geforce 2Ti and the change from my Geforce 256 was amazing.  <br/>
People are amazed that the clouds look like clouds now.  I plan on <br/>
getting the Geforce 4 as soon as the proce drops a bit more.<br/>
<br/>
And I have no Direct X issues.</div>