[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 1967
Date: Tue Dec 11 09:22:31 GMT 2001
Author: alexander.jones@foreningssparbanken.se
Subject: RE: [EverQuest] I hate Shadows of Luclin and I don't even own it yet...
>Can
> SU
>
> I have ben reading this site as recent a few posts. Anyways. Can u
> explain more on this part.? I currently aam not playing EQ. Hehe cant
> afford the tme so i dont pay toplay. Anyways.
>
> >From what U know. If u dont upgrade and get past this pathc problem.
> a Lowedend userlike me stillbe able toplay the classic?are
> (norrath/kunark/veliopus with no probs?)
> I dont get anywhere neaar the abilities onstats. The conly thing I beat
> teh RAM. Hecne i know i got a prob. I can play MAX PAYNE. only cuaseof
> excess ram, a wopping 160.gibe
> I dinot care for the luclin. I am worried can i play the old, hehe pre
> LAGGY LIN. ( I said IT FIRST HAHA LAGGY LIN) but seriouisly IF I
> COME BACK AT FEB 1 AMi totaly screwwed as a lowend USER? DID VERANT
> me a good bye card?already
>
>
> dayam that will byte.
>
>
> SOL RO
> Moltox 53 clr hlf (LFG)
> MOLTY 37 ROG oh ya HLF in inky looks
> ( will kick yo arse, grow a 3rd eye, watch me )
>
>
> > I don't know if I said this already, but some of the chat GMS have
> > suggested that they allow people to continue playing on the lower end soVisit the EverQuest homepage at http://www.everquest.com
> > that they don't lose customers who can't upgrade.
> > luv,
> > -Su
>
>
>
>
> Visit the EverQuest homepage at http://www.everquest.com
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>