[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 1908
Date: Tue Oct 23 19:32:17 BST 2001
Author: Amy Williams
Subject: Re: [EverQuest] Camelot


I have too....eq has been untouched since I bought it, even though I had to
go get a 128mg memory card yesterday cause 64 just couldn't play it. Another
plus for me....the eq music, I have never heard..my sound card can't handle
it, so we have to disable it to play eq, but daoc's music plays just fine
with my crappy sound card lol.....I made a seer and love the fact that she
crits! a caster that can crit? I love it! Take everything good about eq,
and you have daoc...there are a problem or 2, but thats to be expected....eq
had many more probs I hear ( I only started eq a year ago) so I am fully
pleased with my 40 bucks for the game (plus 35 for the memory card lol) its
worth it to me.

But I'm not cancelling eq...hubby still plays and I have some friends who
won't convert hehehe

Synthea Firestorm
40 Druidess
Sirens of the Storm - Drinal Server


>From: "wolffe" <wolffe@...>
>Reply-To: EverQuest@yahoogroups.com
>To: <EverQuest@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: Re: [EverQuest] Camelot
>Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:08:42 -0400
>
>I've been playing DAoC as well. I think you're right in that they've built
>on EQ and are better, much in the same way that EQ was better than UO when
>it came out. I figure that we're all consumers and we play the best game.
>It's nice to have the marketplace competition as each game tries to outdo
>the other. There's nothing wrong or disloyal in switching RPGs, and there
>will be nothing wrong with switching back if/when EQ revamps itself.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Keith J. Hoover
> To: EverQuest@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:39 AM
> Subject: RE: [EverQuest] Camelot
>
>
> I must say that I too have made the switch, haven't touched EQ since
>DAoC came out. Dark Age has had the benefit of hindsight and learning from
>EQ's mistakes. They have built upon them. There is less downtime, more
>character specialization, less annoying corpse runs, better graphics,
>easier grouping, and better pvp. DAoC is better than EQ currently,
>however, to EQ's credit -- Dark Age wouldn't be what it is if it hadn't
>been for EQ's experience.
>
> If you like EQ, I think you'll like Dark Age if not as much, perhaps
>better. The only drawback is that you need a pretty high-end system for
>smooth play (particularly a good graphics card).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: LeSamLam@... [mailto:LeSamLam@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 8:14 AM
> To: EverQuest@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [EverQuest] Camelot
>
>
> My husband has been playing it. In fact, after a few days, he
>cancelled his EQ account and is solely playing DAoC. He keeps telling me
>to try it but I tell him I like EQ just fine. From watching him, I can
>tell I don't wanna play. BUT he's a hardcore gamer and EQ and Solitaire
>are the only games I play. He says it's like EQ but better.
>
> Lena
>
>
>
> have u guys (anyone I mean) heard of the new Dark Ages
> of Camelot game?? I heard it is like EQ but not so
> long, have any of you plsyed it?? I looked around at
> the stores here in my crappy town & didn't see it but
> I have heard good things.... anyone know?
>
>
>
> Visit the EverQuest homepage at http://www.everquest.com
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
> Visit the EverQuest homepage at http://www.everquest.com
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp