Nope. They'd take too much damage and die too fast to be healed, or be a mana sink

----- Original Message -----

From: Wilk Mysliwski

To: EverQuest@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 1:43 AM

Subject: Re: [EverQuest] Why have Rangers?

Wouldn't a druid with a good weapon (fast delay and high damage) be good as a part-time tank at post-20?

Amy Williams wrote:
This is true: I am a very pround L25 almost 26 druid and I can't hit for
crap... LOL Druids are meant to be all around...fillers. We round out the
group, cause we can do almost all of it (melee not included hehe)
My 2¢
Synthea Firestorm from Drinal server
----- Original Message -----
From: "Danspath" <danspth@...>
To: <EverQuest@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 6:04 AM
Subject: Re: [EverQuest] Why have Rangers?

> >why have a ranger at all?
>
> Melee. Druids that get up and try to melee post 20 are
> an irritant and a waste of time better spent medding.
>
>
>
> --- "IT3 Adam J. Daingerfield"
> <persona@...> wrote:
> > Rangers = fighting druids?
> >
> > That's what I think.
> >
> > I mean it...once the druids get tracking at level
> > 20...why have a ranger at
> > all?
> >
> >
> > just me bitching is all :>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
> http://auctions.yahoo.com/
>
> Visit the EverQuest homepage at http://www.everquest.com
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

Visit the EverQuest homepage at http://www.everquest.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.