[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 2955
Date: Mon Nov 6 20:09:34 GMT 2000
Author: Bradley Stanfield
Subject: RE: [eqenchanters] Charisma
> my opinion is that if an enchanter is getting hit,__________________________________________________
> something is wrong.
>
> I guess something is wrong with me then. I get beat
> on all the time. Fact
> is, you will get resisted and then you will get hit.
> Never fails.
>
> On another topic has anyone else tried using AE
> stuns and AE spells to kill
> large pulls instead of mezzing? I was in a group in
> Chardok the other night
> and we had 1 cle 2 wiz 1 dru 1 war and myself. On
> large pulls of 3 and over
> I would ae stun and the wiz and druids would cast ae
> spells. It was prob
> the fastest exp I have ever got at this lvl. Rune V
> is a must and berserker
> on the pull because as you know you will get
> resisted on some of the stuns
> but with 4 memorized its not too hard to keep most
> of them stunned.
>
> Mu
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Osmosis [mailto:osmosis@...]
> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 3:06 AM
> To: eqenchanters@egroups.com
> Subject: Re: [eqenchanters] Charisma
>
>
> Well, to be perfectly honest with you, I would.
>
> 20 AC or 50 HP wouldnt make that much of a
> difference if I'm being hit by a
> level 50+ MOb really, but if I can squeeze an extra
> 20-30 charisma out of
> those lost points and get a better chance at a mez
> or a charm, I personally
> would do it. Personal opinion really, but I've
> never gotten much benefit
> out of AC or HP items.... my opinion is that if an
> enchanter is getting hit,
> something is wrong.
>
> Cogg - RZ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Naeeldar <mailto:jackal@...>
> To: eqenchanters@egroups.com
> <mailto:eqenchanters@egroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2000 2:19 PM
> Subject: Re: [eqenchanters] Charisma
>
> True but it's not something you would want to
> sacrifice say hp or ac items
> for since the return of stats over 200 is almost non
> existant.
>
> Naeeldar
>
>