[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 2246
Date: Wed Dec 15 21:25:05 GMT 1999
Author: Tekdruid
Subject: RE: Specialization


Good Point. What you choose for specialization is dependant on your play
style. It is RECOMMENDED that enchanters specialize in alteration, but if you
think another would be more useful, then specialize in that. A
specialize:Conjuration would be useful as well for an enchanter who is strict
crowd control and doesn't buff/debuff as much. Specialize:Alteration is simply
recommended mostly because most of the enchanters spells ARE Alteration.

Tinik
19 Gnomish Enchanter
Veeshan

On Wednesday, December 15, 1999 2:22 PM, Farr, Robert
[SMTP:Robert.Farr@...] wrote:
> From: "Farr, Robert" <Robert.Farr@...>
>
> The way I did it was to let the cards fall where they may. In other words, I
> trained a point in each and played the way I normally play. If my
> specialization:Evocation had made it first, then obviously it was the one
> that was used most often, and should be the one that got the benefits of
> specialization. As luck would have it, my playstyle emphasized Alteration,
> so that's what my specialty is in. That actually surprised me, given the
> fact that the Mesmerize line of spells is Conjuration, and I use those very
> heavily. Anyway, I guess what I'm trying to say is that specializing in
> Alteration might be a good idea for Enchanters, but it may not be for ALL
> Enchanters.
>
> My 2cp...
>
> Qinie Isil'Goren
> 27 Enchanter
> Mith Marr
>