[<a href='1894.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='1892.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='1894.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='1892.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 1893 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Fri Aug 20 20:47:45 BST 1999 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> mstokes <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Stein - No more - Addendum <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-463741988">Sorry,  I thought you were generalizing.  To answer your question, Yes I<br/>
would be upset too.  Most people I have met were glad that the item could<br/>
be bought for cash, instead of traded for highly camped items.  On the<br/>
bright side, He could always trade the dagger for a Glowing Black Stone +<br/>
Cash.<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt;<br/>
&gt; My point is that the DIDN&#39;T have money to waste.  they sold other<br/>
&gt; possessions, begged, borrowed, and stole to get the money for a stein<br/>
&gt; to hold in their left hand.  This patch is going to change it to a<br/>
&gt; right hand item.  Can you see how they might be upset? </span></blockquote></div>