[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 1676
Date: Thu Jul 22 01:41:05 BST 1999
Author: Garett
Subject: Re: about the new enchant items (long rant)
----- Original Message -----
From: Farr, Robert <robert.farr@...>
To: <eqenchanters@onelist.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 1999 7:46 AM
Subject: RE: [eqenchanters] about the new enchant items (long rant)
> From: "Farr, Robert" <robert.farr@...>
>
> Giving us the ability to enchant items would not add anything to our class
> to unbalance it vs. other casting classes. It is just a continution of our
> current enchant metals line. It is what our class is about. There are lots
> of jewelcrafters out there that aren't enchanters, just as there will be a
> lot of people who aren't enchanters crafting magic weapons and armor if we
> get the ability to enchant ore in the future. This isn't an 'addition' to
> our class, this is finally delivering what was promised...
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: XIII [SMTP:dlepriol@...]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 1999 3:18 AM
> > To: eqenchanters@onelist.com
> > Subject: Re: [eqenchanters] about the new enchant items (long rant)
> >
> > From: XIII <dlepriol@...>
> >
> > Party pooper, party pooper. Ok you know the song, this time I fill the
> > role
> > :).
> >
> > May I point out that the message said that the code was going to be
> > implemented, not that -we- enchanters are going to benefit from it.
True,
> > it was stated in the book we could do it, but at no time in B4 it was in
> > effect, and, according to EQE, we received other benefits to make up for
> > it.
> >
> > As I see it, such thing would overbalance us (enchanters) in regard
> > of
> > other pure spell user classes. So either the benefit will be too small
to
> > even consider it or too huge and Verant might take out something in
return
> > to balance our classe again. Don't tell me we're nerfed now. We were,
> > true,
> > but that was sometime ago and from my point of view we are rather
balanced
> > regarding other pure spell users. To sum up we have our "niche".
> >
> > So, the idea is: By talking here, and offering Verant options to
> > consider
> > we may have a say in the matter and make our class fuller in the
way -we-
> > see it. What I would like to see discussed here is : What can we give up
> > to
> > have a 'proper' enchantment line of spells?. Or are we just to receive
> > this
> > new ability/spell/line of spells without giving up anything?.
> >
> > As stated above, I dont think we can't expect a 'useful' line of
> > enchantment's spells unless we give up something in exchange. Thinking
> > back
> > of Beta, there was a line of spells we didn't have but nonetheless still
> > managed to survive and prosper : Pet line of spells. Plus they don't fit
> > enchanters very well . On the other hand, this line form the very core
of
> > most of our solo strategies so losing it wouldn't be a small thing.
> >
> > This is just an example, a topic's starter. Feel free to agree,
> > disagree
> > or tell me to shut up. Once again my aim to to talk things out here
first
> > and offer something (petition/ EQE/ you name it) constructive to Verant
> > before we see something not implemented or half implemented in place.
> >
> > Best,
> > Ibnabeth / Karana
> > still going up
>
> --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
>
> ONElist members are using Shared Files in great ways!
> http://www.onelist.com
> Are you? If not, see our homepage for details.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------