[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 15956
Date: Fri Mar 10 17:14:03 GMT 2000
Author: Jeff Illian
Subject: RE: [eqbards] Re: Gold Platted Crappy Weapon
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kim@... [mailto:kim@...]
> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 10:52 AM
> To: eqbards@onelist.com
> Subject: Re: [eqbards] Re: Gold Platted Crappy Weapon
>
>
> From: <kim@...>
>
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Eric Boller wrote:
> >
> > Who cares about the proc? Most weapons don't average
> > more than 1 proc every 45 seconds or so anyway
> > (contrary to most people's belief that they average 4
> > or 5 procs per fight). The damage/delay is better
>
> Depends who you usually group with. If you're with casters,
> then I agree. But I'm usually in all-melee or primarily melee
> groups. With fights typically lasting 3+ minutes, the weapons
> *do* average 4-5 procs per fight. :) (I enjoy grouping with
> casters too, but long melee fights makes the effect of my
> songs more obvious so I can fine tune the mix better.)
>
> > than the ykesha and ebw (not taking into account magic
> > numbers and lower delay,etc). I guess I still don't
> > see why you guys think it is crappy. Granted it is
> > off a dragon and is only marginally better than your
> > ykesh or ebw. However, unless you have a planar
> > weapon I would consider this better. Anyway, anyone
> > on Tunare who think this weapon is crappy--I will
> > gladly take your crappy weapon!
>
> If it looks like a plain old dagger, that makes it crappy in
> my book. :)
>
> --
> John H. Kim
> kim@...
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> MAXIMIZE YOUR CARD, MINIMIZE YOUR RATE!
> Get a NextCard Visa, in 30 seconds! Get rates as low as
> 0.0% Intro or 9.9% Fixed APR and no hidden fees.
> Apply NOW!
> http://click.egroups.com/1/2122/5/_/451022/_/952707128/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to
> lol@... with the subject submissions.
>