[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 516
Date: Fri Apr 23 17:46:28 BST 1999
Author: John Cuyle
Subject: Re: PvP BIND AFFINITY y/n??
----- Original Message -----
From: Shane Bennett <hadji_@...>
To: <eq_wizards@onelist.com>
Sent: Friday, April 23, 1999 6:06 AM
Subject: [eq_wizards] Re: PvP BIND AFFINITY y/n??
> From: Shane Bennett <hadji_@...>
>
> >I wish UO had not poisoned my mind so much against
> >PvP, but it was just
> >heinous. Most UO PKers didn't even kill you in
> >character, it was like
> >"HE
> >*&*$^&$ YOU ARE DEAD F*&%ER YOU SUCK blah blah blah"
>
> I agree with you like the other guy said there may be
> a large portion who are good but I can see all kinds
> of problems if +PVP spells can effect -PVP. As far as
> the bind goes you have to be in the Binders party to
> be bound to that city so we have that in our favor.
> Maybe they could implement something to where +PVP
> spells can effect -PVP if they are in the same party?
> But random casting I think is a bad idea. I quit UO
> because of the Pkers I don't want the same thing to
> happen to EQ. EQ is not Quake if you want random
> killing for no other reason than to rack up a body
> count and to talk trash while you do it get out of EQ.
>
> Azzameen High Elf Wizard
> Lost Order of Akalabeth
> Veeshan Server
>
>
>
> ===
> +-----------------------------------+
> | Shane Bennett |
> | Consultant - Microsoft Team |
> | Global Professional Services |
> | Computer Associates International |
> | http://www.cai.com |
> +-----------------------------------+
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @... address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Start a new hobby. Meet a new friend.
> http://www.ONElist.com
> ONElist: The leading provider of free e-mail list services!
>