[<a href='2052.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='2050.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='2053.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='2050.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 2051 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Fri May 28 21:15:50 BST 1999 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Gregory Egan <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: suggestions to Verant <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-645570570">This is how i think it should be in EQ.  Just my little rant on why people <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;want more spells and more power.  sorry if it&#39;s to long...<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;Parthon lvl 12<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Well said. How ironic can it be when we are told time and again that<br/>
wizards are the offensive powerhouses of the game, but we can&#39;t touch reds<br/>
that other spellcasters can?<br/>
Does that make any sense? Where&#39;s the balance to that?<br/>
<br/>
Greg (Kronan)</div>