[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 2120
Date: Fri May 12 23:46:48 BST 2000
Author: Thom Green
Subject: Re: [EQ_Necromancer] Kunark system specs


I have 2 computers one running with a voodoo3 2k and the other with a 3500
and I can tell the dif between the two in Kurnak, even though they both slow
down when I have the clipping plane maxxed. Of course one thing I do like
about my voodoo3 is how well I can adjust the gama on it, to where when its
dark to my human, it doesn't make much of a problem.


>From: "Me" <hoffmann@...>
>Reply-To: EQ_Necromancer@egroups.com
>To: <EQ_Necromancer@egroups.com>
>Subject: Re: [EQ_Necromancer] Kunark system specs
>Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 17:56:29 -0400
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Mark Rafn" <dagon@...>
>
> > Anyone have any more concrete data on Glide vs DirectX speed in EQ? I'd
> > love to hear that it's just something I've set up wrong. Alternately,
>I'd
> > perhaps be willing to go buy a Voodoo3 card if I knew for sure it would
> > make Kunark a lot better.
> > --
>
>
>It doesnt. I have a Vodoo3000, and I feel like I lag in Kunark more then
>anybody. I think a GOOD part of the issue with lag and frame rates
>there....the damn trees move....all the time. That has to wreak hell on
>the
>graphics end of a system. If not, well, why do we need to see the leaves
>blowing in the breeze...??
>
>
>

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com