[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 1738
Date: Thu Jan 20 06:38:06 GMT 2000
Author: Tony B
Subject: Re: Digest Number 222
>From: Aazen1@...______________________________________________________
>Reply-To: EQ_Necromancer@onelist.com
>To: EQ_Necromancer@onelist.com
>Subject: Re: [EQ_Necromancer] Digest Number 222
>Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 00:20:21 EST
>
>I wasn't sure if regular heals worked on our pets, but I know for a FACT
>that
>regulars work on Mage pets. As a Druid, I usta group with a Mage and I
>could
>just sit back and keep his pet healed.
>
>In a message dated 1/18/00 4:23:12 AM Pacific Standard Time,
>EQ_Necromancer@onelist.com writes:
>
><< Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 18:45:09 -0500
> From: "Dark" <jackal@...>
> Subject: Re: Magician pet heal spells?
>
> Heh well regular heal spells work on our pet. So it's quite fair. I don't
> think heals work on magi pets anyway.
>
> Naeeldar
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aazen1@... <Aazen1@...>
> To: EQ_Necromancer@onelist.com <EQ_Necromancer@onelist.com>
> Date: Monday, January 17, 2000 4:02 PM
> Subject: [EQ_Necromancer] Magician pet heal spells?
>
>
> >From: Aazen1@...
> >
> >If you haven't already, go take a look over at the EQCasters site. They
> have
> >said that they are going to be adding 2 pet heal spells?! Correct me if
>I'm
> >mistaken, but I thought that we got pet heal spells because regular
> peoples'
> >heals would not work on OUR pets, but they would on Mages. I guess its
> >true-Anyone besides Necromancer(lol), who whines long enough, gets what
> they
> >want. >>