[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 1542
Date: Wed Dec 1 02:52:56 GMT 1999
Author: Dark
Subject: Re: Digest Number 189
>From: "Kevin Neal" <kevin@...>buffs
>
>Not neccisarily. Why put buffs on a character that doesn't need them? I
>mean, wouldn't you save mana to buff those who need it? Like tanks and
>such? However, you could get someone to buff you, letting them know that
>means you can work much more efficiently with the nice lifetap, manastone,
>lifetap, manastone process. Well....that was till we got nerfed :(-.
>
>Manueal
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Dicey" <dicey@...>
>To: <EQ_Necromancer@onelist.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 1999 5:27 AM
>Subject: RE: [EQ_Necromancer] Digest Number 189
>
>
>> From: dicey@... (Dicey)
>>
>> If you were to go on a Dragon raid, I am sure you would have so many
>> piled up that you would have much much more than 766 HP.the
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ort-Man [mailto:ortman@...]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 1999 7:36 PM
>> To: EQ_Necromancer@onelist.com
>> Subject: Re: [EQ_Necromancer] Digest Number 189
>>
>>
>> From: Ort-Man <ortman@...>
>>
>>
>> I have a level 50 wizard. I can't remember for sure, but I think I have
>> 766 hit points unbuffed. Nagafen's AoE can kill me in one or two
>> rounds... :P
>>
>> > Have never been on a dragon raid, so I don't know the actualy AOE of
>> > spell, but I would think the AOE damage spell they cast would eat theand
>> necros
>> > up and if not well the fear running you around would.. Plus 1 summon
>> > byebye necro and pet... I could be wrong, but I really don't think itbe
>> would
>> > work.. Hope to go on a dragon raid soon and find out for myself exactly
>> what
>> > the dragons are like.
>>
>> This list is basically unmoderated. However abusive language will not be
>> tolerated
>>
>> > This list is basically unmoderated. However abusive language will not
>toleratedtolerated
>
>>This list is basically unmoderated. However abusive language will not be
>