er...scratch that!

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Neal" <kevin@...>
To: <EQ_Necromancer@onelist.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 1999 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: [EQ_Necromancer] Digest Number 189

> From: "Kevin Neal" <kevin@...>
>
> Not neccisarily. Why put buffs on a character that doesn't need them? I
> mean, wouldn't you save mana to buff those who need it? Like tanks and
> such? However, you could get someone to buff you, letting them know that
> means you can work much more efficiently with the nice lifetap, manastone,
> lifetap, manastone process. Well....that was till we got nerfed :(-.
>
> Manueal
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dicey" <dicey@...>
> To: <EQ_Necromancer@onelist.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 1999 5:27 AM
> Subject: RE: [EQ_Necromancer] Digest Number 189
>
>
> > From: dicey@... (Dicey)
> >
> > If you were to go on a Dragon raid, I am sure you would have so many
buffs
> > piled up that you would have much much more than 766 HP.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ort-Man [mailto:ortman@...]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 1999 7:36 PM
> > To: EQ_Necromancer@onelist.com
> > Subject: Re: [EQ_Necromancer] Digest Number 189
> >
> >
> > From: Ort-Man <ortman@...>
> >
> >
> > I have a level 50 wizard. I can't remember for sure, but I think I have
> > 766 hit points unbuffed. Nagafen's AoE can kill me in one or two
> > rounds... :P
> >
> > > Have never been on a dragon raid, so I don't know the actualy AOE of
the
> > > spell, but I would think the AOE damage spell they cast would eat the
> > necros
> > > up and if not well the fear running you around would.. Plus 1 summon
and
> > > byebye necro and pet... I could be wrong, but I really don't think it
> > would
> > > work.. Hope to go on a dragon raid soon and find out for myself
exactly
> > what
> > > the dragons are like.
> >
> > This list is basically unmoderated. However abusive language will not
be
> > tolerated
> >
> > > This list is basically unmoderated. However abusive language will not
be
> tolerated
>
> > This list is basically unmoderated. However abusive language will not be
tolerated