We get mend and are just as vicious naked as armored... Fighters are wimps
without weapons, and unless they have potions of healing, are screwed
outside of groups, yet I can solo fairly effectively as a monk. Having
played both, I enjoy the monk better because it IS better than a warrior.
That said, all the warriors could just be monks and be done with it :)
Steve.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jesse Pink [mailto:
maerjyon@...]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 1999 9:37 AM
To:
EQ-Monks@onelist.com
Subject: [EQ-Monks] Warrior Petition?
What I want to know is what is with this warrior petition. Granted
maybe the warrior class is not really any better than the paladin class in
melee (and it is, IMHO), but why should warriors get another big boost over
the already humbled monk? Despite the fact that we get feign death
eventually, our armor class and atttack does not usually equal that of a
warrior, which is alright now, but if they get another boost, where is this
going to leave the monk. I for one am against the warrior update, unless
the make a minimal change to the monk class. I'm not asking for much, I'm
just asking for something that by making the warrior "king of melee" that
they just not leave the monks in the dust.
Maerjyon, 11th Rank monk, E'ci