[<a href='800.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='798.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='800.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='0.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 799 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Fri Oct  8 07:11:02 BST 1999 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> David Blank <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Lots o Wizard groups <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-269286151"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt;1. Bard<br/>
&gt;2. Wizard<br/>
&gt;3. Wizard<br/>
&gt;4. Wizard<br/>
&gt;5. Wizard<br/>
&gt;6. Enchanter<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>For what purpose?  You always have to ask that? <br/>
Once this group is sitting in a room you&#39;ll do <br/>
fine...how you&#39;ll ever survive to get there is <br/>
the question. :)  More casters = more downtime <br/>
from all that mana being used.  Now the Bard <br/>
and Encanter help minimize that but essentially <br/>
all your damage is from those wizzies dumping<br/>
on the poor beastie.  I had this same argument <br/>
with a friend and he took the above party <br/>
approach exactly...until the saw it in action <br/>
and realized how poorly it stacks up for dungeon <br/>
crawling to:<br/>
<br/>
1. Monk (best puller in the game bar none)<br/>
2. Warrior (best damage sponge bar none)<br/>
3. Enchanter (amazing...simply amazing)<br/>
4. Cleric (superior/complete heals and res&#39;s)<br/>
5. Shaman (best friend of any tank...2nd healer :)<br/>
6. Druid (Evacs, damage shields and 2nd healer)<br/>
<br/>
Some flexability there but this is pretty darn <br/>
good overall.<br/>
<br/>
=====</div>