[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 711
Date: Mon Sep 20 21:28:03 BST 1999
Author: Bennett, Brian
Subject: RE: Isn't this a monk mailing list?


Congratulations. You took the twinking debate lower than it has been yet.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dizzy J. [mailto:dizzyj@...]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 1999 4:12 PM
To: EQ-Monks@onelist.com
Subject: Re: [EQ-Monks] Isn't this a monk mailing list?


From: "Dizzy J." <dizzyj@...>

hmm...let see

1) The discussions have revolved around monk issues
2) the people dropping have never contributed
3) fills up your mailbox? learn to use a filter

On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Dave Kuehn wrote:

> From: Dave Kuehn <dwkuehn@...>
>
> I'm sure that you have all noticed that people have been dropping from
this
> list like flies, and to tell the truth I'm about ready to quit too. I
> didn't sign up to hear people bitch and moan about twinking and spell
> nerfing. While I'm not positive, I would think that most of you didn't
> sign up to hear about it either. Yet that is what fills up my mailbox day

> in and day out now. Please drop it and lets get back to monks before
> anyone else is alienated from what used to be a worthwhile list. If it's
> really an issue for you, just create EQ-Twinkers and EQ-Nerfs mailing
lists
> and carry on there.
>
> Dorath
>
>
> >