[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 641
Date: Wed Sep 15 21:31:06 BST 1999
Author: Ryugen Lee
Subject: Re: Another take on twinking
>From: Charles Lembke <c-lembke@...>
>Reply-To: EQ-Monks@onelist.com
>To: "'EQ-Monks@onelist.com'" <EQ-Monks@onelist.com>
>Subject: [EQ-Monks] Another take on twinking
>Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 14:11:35 -0500
>
>From: Charles Lembke <c-lembke@...>
>
>I tend to run many different characters; monk, warrior, shaman, bard,
>cleric, paladin, magician, and wizard. And yes, I twink between them, but
>not outrageously so, and not so it unbalances anything. For example, my
>monk (lvl 10) was generating cash at a healthy clip. So he gave all his
>money to my warrior blacksmith (lvl 19). The blacksmith use the pp to make
>a partial suite of large banded armor for my ogre shaman (lvl 8), who in
>turn is looking for mesh armor in Upper Guk for my monk. I try to make it
>more of a micro economy. If these three characters were owned by different
>people, it wouldn't be a twink at all.
>
>I have no doubt that there is outrageous twinking going on (saw a lvl 8
>ogre
>warrior with full bronze plate), but I think you can twink within reason
>and
>not upset the game balance.
>
>Charles Lembke
>c-lembke@...
>AKA, Raelph, Vulfgange, Argharghargharh, Orpheuss, Matar, and company.
>
>--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
>
> New!! Free E-mail @..., @..., @... and more!
>Mail.com makes it easy to set up a free, personalized e-mail address
> that you can access anytime and anywhere.
> http://www.onelist.com/ad/mailcom1
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>