[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 1071
Date: Thu Dec 16 16:09:48 GMT 1999
Author: Dave Gaines
Subject: Re: Digest Number 122
>Yes, excactly, not you in particular at all, you as in general, anyone.
> From: "Goode, Jason" <JGoode@...>
>
> Just for clarification, I'll assume when you say "you", you mean the vauge,
> general, collective "you", not me in particular, as you've not once seen me
> complain, but rather, just this once, try to speculate as to exactly why so
> many are so upset. Now, on to your points:
>
> What you say about the social evolution of games is true, but I'll wagerNo bridge, but they should have played some tag, hide and seek, kickball,
> most of the EQ players about today didn't grow up with bridge night with
> the Jones' from next door. For them, this is largely a new phenomena.
>
> Nor, do I recall that anyone has once stated that their existing friendsSorry, I assumed by the statements I have previously read, like
> deny them groups and interactions. So, discard that paragraph.
>
>Monks can't. Verant believes the ability of classes to pull so safely
> Look, if you want to help, stop further insulting them and making them feel
> worse. Instead, do this:
>
> 1) Come up with examples and arguments demonstrating that they can still do
> everything they used to, or alternately propose new ways in which they can
> explore and express.
>